But, is everything as bad? from A's point of view, the novel is a constant struggle to decide whether to survive or to kill yourself. But there is an important point to consider, as the main character is a father, is he actually going to be selfish enough to kill himself with the spare bullet leaving his son defenseless against the countless dangers of the endless wasteland he is currently living? or he might be responsible enough to survive until his son is safe? The second possibility seems to suit the novels ideals better. It is reasonable to think that he loves his son, even more, he finds his happiness in him. In conclusion, I disagree with A's position because I think it is more plausible that the main character would survive for his son before dying himself.
So, we can see through the words or we can see through (past) the words?
Considering that we all make different interpretation on words...
I think that of sight...
if we do 0 kind
we different
all a
have

No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario